Appendiceal mucocele

Changed by Mohamed Saber, 15 Dec 2022
Disclosures - updated 17 Aug 2022: Nothing to disclose

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Appendiceal mucoceles occur when obstruction of the appendiceal lumen causes mucus to accumulate and progressively distend the appendix. The term describes an imaging appearance rather than a pathological entity. The underlying causes lie on a spectrum between benign obstruction with retention cyst and malignant obstruction due to invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Epidemiology

The reported prevalence at appendicectomy is 0.2-0.3%. They are thought to typically present in middle-aged individuals, particularly considering the epidemiology of the mucinous neoplasms. Though carcinoid tumour is the most common primary appendiceal neoplasm in surgical pathology series, mucoceles due to neoplasms are the most common appendiceal tumours detected on imaging 7.

Pathology

The term mucocele is simply a macroscopic description of an appendix that is grossly distended by mucus 7,12. They may be caused by either benign or malignant lesions, categorised by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) in 2012 into the following types:

  • mucus retention cyst due to obstruction (most commonly by a faecolith or appendicolith)

  • serrated polyp (previously mucosal hyperplasia)

  • low-grade or high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN or HAMN): most common11

  • mucinous adenocarcinoma of appendix (MACA)

Variants
  • myxoglobulosis: a rare mucocele variant seen with multiple small intraluminal globules which can calcify and produce 1-10 mm mobile calcifications

Radiographic features

Plain radiograph

It can be characterised by a right iliac fossa mass with peripheral calcifications 12

Fluoroscopy
Barium enema

If a contrast examination is performed, there is usually non-filling or partial-filling of the appendix. Where there is a large mucocele, the associated mass effect can cause the indentation or lateral displacement of the caecum.

Ultrasound

Typically cystic mass with variable internal echogenicity 8. The presence of an "onion sign" (sonographic layering within a cystic mass) is considered a highly suggestive feature 2,6. Acoustic shadowing may be present due to the mural calcifications 12

CT

They are typically seen as a well-circumscribed, low-attenuation, spherical, or tubular mass contiguous with the base of the caecum.  

  • curvilinear mural calcification suggests the diagnosis but is seen in less than 50% of cases 

  • intraluminal bubbles of gas or a gas-fluid level within a mucocele indicate the presence of superinfection, which can occur in both benign and malignant mucoceles

  • mural nodularity and irregular wall thickening are suggestive of a malignant process 12

When identifying a mucocele on CT, a search for extraluminal mucin is mandatory, which are low attenuation deposits commonly seen in certain locations 12:

  • periappendiceal space 

  • peritoneal cavity

  • at the surface of abdominal viscera, including ovaries and bowel

MRI

Seen as a rounded right iliac fossa mass and the typical signal characteristics include:

  • T1: depending on the mucin concentration, the signal may be variable, from hypointense to isointense 9

  • T2: hyperintense

Treatment and prognosis

Treatment is usually surgical.

Complications

History and etymology

In 1842, Rokitansky described appendiceal mucocele for the first time 15.

Differential diagnosis

Differentiating benign (non-neoplastic mucocele and mucinous cystadenoma) and malignant (mucinous cystadenocarcinoma) appendiceal lesions can be difficult on imaging. Wang et al. 10 found a statistically significant difference in wall irregularity and soft-tissue thickening between malignant and benign cases.

Appendicitis and appendiceal mucocele may be difficult to differentiate, and may sometimes co-exist 12,13.

  • an outer diameter of 15 mm or more was predictive of mucocele of the appendix with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 92%13

  • cystic dilatation of the appendix, mural calcification, and a luminal diameter greater than 13-15 mm are considered features suggestive of coexisting mucocele in patients with acute appendicitis 13,14

  • Marotta et al found that dilatation limited to the distal appendix in combination with mural calcification and diameter >2cm are associated with malignancy17

  • -<p><strong>Appendiceal mucoceles</strong> occur when obstruction of the appendiceal lumen causes mucus to accumulate and progressively distend the appendix. The term describes an imaging appearance rather than a pathological entity. The underlying causes lie on a spectrum between benign obstruction with retention cyst and malignant obstruction due to invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>The reported prevalence at appendicectomy is 0.2-0.3%. They are thought to typically present in middle-aged individuals, particularly considering the epidemiology of the mucinous neoplasms. Though <a href="/articles/appendiceal-carcinoid">carcinoid tumour</a> is the most common primary appendiceal neoplasm in surgical pathology series, mucoceles due to neoplasms are the most common appendiceal tumours detected on imaging <sup>7</sup>.</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The term mucocele is simply a macroscopic description of an appendix that is grossly distended by mucus <sup>7,12</sup>. They may be caused by either benign or malignant lesions, categorised by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) in 2012 into the following types:</p><ul>
  • -<li><p>mucus retention cyst due to obstruction (most commonly by a faecolith or <a href="/articles/appendicolith">appendicolith</a>)</p></li>
  • -<li><p>serrated polyp (previously mucosal hyperplasia)</p></li>
  • -<li><p>low-grade or high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN or HAMN): most common<sup>11</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p><a href="/articles/mucinous-adenocarcinoma-of-the-appendix">mucinous adenocarcinoma of appendix</a> (MACA)</p></li>
  • -</ul><h5>Variants</h5><ul><li><p><a href="/articles/myxoglobulosis">myxoglobulosis</a>: a rare mucocele variant seen with multiple small intraluminal globules which can calcify and produce 1-10 mm mobile calcifications</p></li></ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Plain radiograph</h5><p>It can be characterised by a right iliac fossa mass with peripheral calcifications <sup>12</sup>. </p><h5>Fluoroscopy</h5><h6>Barium enema</h6><p>If a contrast examination is performed, there is usually non-filling or partial-filling of the appendix. Where there is a large mucocele, the associated mass effect can cause the indentation or lateral displacement of the <a href="/articles/caecum">caecum</a>.</p><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>Typically cystic mass with variable internal echogenicity <sup>8</sup>. The presence of an "<a href="/articles/onion-sign">onion sign</a>" (sonographic layering within a cystic mass) is considered a highly suggestive feature <sup>2,6</sup>. Acoustic shadowing may be present due to the mural calcifications <sup>12</sup>. </p><h5>CT</h5><p>They are typically seen as a well-circumscribed, low-attenuation, spherical, or tubular mass contiguous with the base of the caecum.  </p><ul>
  • -<li><p>curvilinear mural calcification suggests the diagnosis but is seen in less than 50% of cases </p></li>
  • -<li><p>intraluminal bubbles of gas or a gas-fluid level within a mucocele indicate the presence of superinfection, which can occur in both benign and malignant mucoceles</p></li>
  • -<li><p>mural nodularity and irregular wall thickening are suggestive of a malignant process <sup>12</sup></p></li>
  • -</ul><p>When identifying a mucocele on CT, a search for extraluminal mucin is mandatory, which are low attenuation deposits commonly seen in certain locations <sup>12</sup>:</p><ul>
  • -<li><p>periappendiceal space </p></li>
  • -<li><p>peritoneal cavity</p></li>
  • -<li><p>at the surface of abdominal viscera, including ovaries and bowel</p></li>
  • -</ul><h5>MRI</h5><p>Seen as a rounded right iliac fossa mass and the typical signal characteristics include:</p><ul>
  • -<li><p><strong>T1:</strong> depending on the mucin concentration, the signal may be variable, from hypointense to isointense <sup>9</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p><strong>T2:</strong> hyperintense</p></li>
  • -</ul><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>Treatment is usually surgical.</p><h5>Complications</h5><ul>
  • -<li><p>rupture: may lead to <a href="/articles/pseudomyxoma-peritonei">pseudomyxoma peritonei</a> (mucinous ascites) if the underlying cause is neoplastic <sup>11,12</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p>can act as a lead point and result in an <a href="/articles/intussusception">ileocolic intussusception</a> <sup>9</sup></p></li>
  • -</ul><h4>History and etymology</h4><p>In 1842, <strong>Rokitansky</strong> described appendiceal mucocele for the first time <sup>15</sup>.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><p>Differentiating benign (non-neoplastic mucocele and mucinous cystadenoma) and malignant (mucinous cystadenocarcinoma) appendiceal lesions can be difficult on imaging. Wang et al. <sup>10</sup> found a statistically significant difference in wall irregularity and soft-tissue thickening between malignant and benign cases.</p><p>Appendicitis and appendiceal mucocele may be difficult to differentiate, and may sometimes co-exist <sup>12,13</sup>.</p><ul>
  • -<li><p>an outer diameter of 15 mm or more was predictive of mucocele of the appendix with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 92%<sup>13</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p>cystic dilatation of the appendix, mural calcification, and a luminal diameter greater than 13-15 mm are considered features suggestive of coexisting mucocele in patients with acute appendicitis <sup>13,14</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p>Marotta et al found that dilatation limited to the distal appendix in combination with mural calcification and diameter &gt;2cm are associated with malignancy<sup>17</sup></p></li>
  • +<p><strong>Appendiceal mucoceles</strong> occur when obstruction of the appendiceal lumen causes mucus to accumulate and progressively distend the appendix. The term describes an imaging appearance rather than a pathological entity. The underlying causes lie on a spectrum between benign obstruction with retention cyst and malignant obstruction due to invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>The reported prevalence at appendicectomy is 0.2-0.3%. They are thought to typically present in middle-aged individuals, particularly considering the epidemiology of the mucinous neoplasms. Though <a href="/articles/appendiceal-carcinoid">carcinoid tumour</a> is the most common primary appendiceal neoplasm in surgical pathology series, mucoceles due to neoplasms are the most common appendiceal tumours detected on imaging <sup>7</sup>.</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The term mucocele is simply a macroscopic description of an appendix that is grossly distended by mucus <sup>7,12</sup>. They may be caused by either benign or malignant lesions, categorised by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) in 2012 into the following types:</p><ul>
  • +<li><p>mucus retention cyst due to obstruction (most commonly by a faecolith or <a href="/articles/appendicolith">appendicolith</a>)</p></li>
  • +<li><p>serrated polyp (previously mucosal hyperplasia)</p></li>
  • +<li><p>low-grade or high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN or HAMN): most common<sup>11</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p><a href="/articles/mucinous-adenocarcinoma-of-the-appendix">mucinous adenocarcinoma of appendix</a> (MACA)</p></li>
  • +</ul><h5>Variants</h5><ul><li><p><a href="/articles/myxoglobulosis">myxoglobulosis</a>: a rare mucocele variant seen with multiple small intraluminal globules which can calcify and produce 1-10 mm mobile calcifications</p></li></ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Plain radiograph</h5><p>It can be characterised by a right iliac fossa mass with peripheral calcifications <sup>12</sup>. </p><h5>Fluoroscopy</h5><h6>Barium enema</h6><p>If a contrast examination is performed, there is usually non-filling or partial-filling of the appendix. Where there is a large mucocele, the associated mass effect can cause the indentation or lateral displacement of the <a href="/articles/caecum">caecum</a>.</p><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>Typically cystic mass with variable internal echogenicity <sup>8</sup>. The presence of an "<a href="/articles/onion-sign">onion sign</a>" (sonographic layering within a cystic mass) is considered a highly suggestive feature <sup>2,6</sup>. Acoustic shadowing may be present due to the mural calcifications <sup>12</sup>. </p><h5>CT</h5><p>They are typically seen as a well-circumscribed, low-attenuation, spherical, or tubular mass contiguous with the base of the caecum.  </p><ul>
  • +<li><p>curvilinear mural calcification suggests the diagnosis but is seen in less than 50% of cases </p></li>
  • +<li><p>intraluminal bubbles of gas or a gas-fluid level within a mucocele indicate the presence of superinfection, which can occur in both benign and malignant mucoceles</p></li>
  • +<li><p>mural nodularity and irregular wall thickening are suggestive of a malignant process <sup>12</sup></p></li>
  • +</ul><p>When identifying a mucocele on CT, a search for extraluminal mucin is mandatory, which are low attenuation deposits commonly seen in certain locations <sup>12</sup>:</p><ul>
  • +<li><p>periappendiceal space </p></li>
  • +<li><p>peritoneal cavity</p></li>
  • +<li><p>at the surface of abdominal viscera, including ovaries and bowel</p></li>
  • +</ul><h5>MRI</h5><p>Seen as a rounded right iliac fossa mass and the typical signal characteristics include:</p><ul>
  • +<li><p><strong>T1:</strong> depending on the mucin concentration, the signal may be variable, from hypointense to isointense <sup>9</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p><strong>T2:</strong> hyperintense</p></li>
  • +</ul><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>Treatment is usually surgical.</p><h5>Complications</h5><ul>
  • +<li><p>rupture: may lead to <a href="/articles/pseudomyxoma-peritonei">pseudomyxoma peritonei</a> (mucinous ascites) if the underlying cause is neoplastic <sup>11,12</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p>can act as a lead point and result in an <a href="/articles/intussusception">ileocolic intussusception</a> <sup>9</sup></p></li>
  • +</ul><h4>History and etymology</h4><p>In 1842, <strong>Rokitansky</strong> described appendiceal mucocele for the first time <sup>15</sup>.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><p>Differentiating benign (non-neoplastic mucocele and mucinous cystadenoma) and malignant (mucinous cystadenocarcinoma) appendiceal lesions can be difficult on imaging. Wang et al. <sup>10</sup> found a statistically significant difference in wall irregularity and soft-tissue thickening between malignant and benign cases.</p><p>Appendicitis and appendiceal mucocele may be difficult to differentiate, and may sometimes co-exist <sup>12,13</sup>.</p><ul>
  • +<li><p>an outer diameter of 15 mm or more was predictive of mucocele of the appendix with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 92%<sup>13</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p>cystic dilatation of the appendix, mural calcification, and a luminal diameter greater than 13-15 mm are considered features suggestive of coexisting mucocele in patients with acute appendicitis <sup>13,14</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p>Marotta et al found that dilatation limited to the distal appendix in combination with mural calcification and diameter &gt;2cm are associated with malignancy<sup>17</sup></p></li>
Images Changes:

Image 26 CT (C+ portal venous phase) ( create )

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.