Breast architectural distortion

Changed by Andrew Murphy, 23 Mar 2023
Disclosures - updated 4 Sep 2022: Nothing to disclose

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Breast architectural distortion is a descriptive term in breast imaging (mammography, ultrasound, and MRI) to indicate that the breast parenchyma is tethered or indented. The finding per se is not a mass.

Pathology

Architectural distortion is often due to a desmoplastic reaction in which there is focal disruption of the normal breast tissue pattern. There are several features that can be considered as part of architectural distortion 3:

  • contour abnormality
  • trabecular thickening
  • trabecular disorganisation
Aetiology

Many entities can cause architectural distortion 1,4.In practice, the most common are surgery and malignancy. It is considered the third most common appearance of breast cancer 1,6.

Radiographic features

Architectural distortion can be visually subtle. Compared to 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis increases the sensitivity, confidence, and interobserver agreement in detection of architectural distortion 7-10. Tomosynthesis also helps localizelocalise the abnormality. Targeted ultrasound should then be performed to confirm the finding, but MRI is an alternative if no ultrasound correlate is found 9.

Mammography/US/MRI

Architectural distortion is characterizedcharacterised by a number of possible appearances 5:

  • radiating thin straight lines or spiculations
  • focal retraction, distortion, or straightening at the edge of the parenchyma
  • blurring of normal tissue planes such as the fat-fibroglandular junction
  • straightening or thickening of Cooper ligaments
  • compression of tissue around a mass

Radiology report

Architectural distortion can be reported as a standalone finding or be associated with (adjacent to) another finding, such as asymmetrycalcifications, or mass. In most cases, architectural distortion is a suspicious finding (BI-RADS 4) 8,9. The BI-RADS Atlas suggests that an ultrasound finding of architectural distortion thought to be due to postsurgical scar may be categorizedcategorised as probably benign (BI-RADS 3), but there is sparse data supporting this approach 5.

See also

  • -<p><strong>Breast architectural distortion</strong> is a descriptive term in breast imaging (mammography, ultrasound, and MRI) to indicate that the breast parenchyma is tethered or indented. The finding per se is not a mass.</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>Architectural distortion is often due to a <a href="/articles/desmoplasia-1">desmoplastic reaction</a> in which there is focal disruption of the normal breast tissue pattern. There are several features that can be considered as part of architectural distortion <sup>3</sup>:</p><ul>
  • -<li>contour abnormality</li>
  • -<li>trabecular thickening</li>
  • -<li>trabecular disorganisation</li>
  • -</ul><h5>Aetiology</h5><p>Many entities can cause architectural distortion <sup>1,4</sup>.<sup> </sup>In practice, the most common are surgery and malignancy. It is considered the third most common appearance of <a href="/articles/breast-neoplasms">breast cancer</a> <sup>1,6</sup>.</p><ul>
  • -<li>primary causes<ul>
  • -<li>invasive <a href="/articles/breast-neoplasms">breast cancer</a>, including both <a href="/articles/invasive-lobular-carcinoma-of-the-breast">invasive lobular carcinoma</a> and <a href="/articles/invasive-ductal-carcinoma">invasive ductal carcinoma</a>
  • -</li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/ductal-carcinoma-in-situ">ductal carcinoma in situ</a></li>
  • -<li>
  • -<a href="/articles/radial-scar">radial scar</a>/<a href="/articles/radial-scar">complex sclerosing lesion</a>
  • -</li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/fat-necrosis-breast-2">fat necrosis</a></li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/sclerosing-adenosis-of-the-breast">sclerosing adenosis</a></li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/fibromatosis-of-the-breast">fibromatosis</a></li>
  • -</ul>
  • -</li>
  • -<li>secondary causes <ul>
  • -<li>
  • -<a href="/articles/post-surgical-breast-scar-1">postsurgical scars</a> (most common)</li>
  • -<li>trauma</li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/mastitis">infection</a></li>
  • -</ul>
  • -</li>
  • -</ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><p>Architectural distortion can be visually subtle. Compared to 2D mammography, <a href="/articles/digital-breast-tomosynthesis">digital breast tomosynthesis</a> increases the sensitivity, confidence, and interobserver agreement in detection of architectural distortion <sup>7-10</sup>. Tomosynthesis also helps localize the abnormality. Targeted ultrasound should then be performed to confirm the finding, but MRI is an alternative if no ultrasound correlate is found <sup>9</sup>.</p><h5>Mammography/US/MRI</h5><p>Architectural distortion is characterized by a number of possible appearances <sup>5</sup>:</p><ul>
  • -<li>radiating thin straight lines or spiculations</li>
  • -<li>focal retraction, distortion, or straightening at the edge of the parenchyma</li>
  • -<li>blurring of normal tissue planes such as the fat-fibroglandular junction</li>
  • -<li>straightening or thickening of <a href="/articles/cooper-ligament">Cooper ligaments</a>
  • -</li>
  • -<li>compression of tissue around a mass</li>
  • -</ul><h4>Radiology report</h4><p>Architectural distortion can be reported as a standalone finding or be associated with (adjacent to) another finding, such as <a href="/articles/asymmetry-mammography">asymmetry</a>, <a href="/articles/breast-calcifications">calcifications</a>, or <a href="/articles/breast-mass">mass</a>. In most cases, architectural distortion is a suspicious finding (<a href="/articles/breast-imaging-reporting-and-data-system-bi-rads-assessment-category-4">BI-RADS 4</a>) <sup>8,</sup><sup>9</sup>. The BI-RADS Atlas suggests that an ultrasound finding of architectural distortion thought to be due to postsurgical scar may be categorized as probably benign (<a href="/articles/breast-imaging-reporting-and-data-system-bi-rads-assessment-category-3">BI-RADS 3</a>), but there is sparse data supporting this approach <sup>5</sup>.</p><h4>See also</h4><ul><li>other imaging features of breast malignancy<ul>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/breast-mass">masses</a></li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/asymmetry-mammography">asymmetries</a></li>
  • -<li><a href="/articles/breast-calcifications">calcifications</a></li>
  • -</ul>
  • +<p><strong>Breast architectural distortion</strong> is a descriptive term in breast imaging (mammography, ultrasound, and MRI) to indicate that the breast parenchyma is tethered or indented. The finding per se is not a mass.</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>Architectural distortion is often due to a <a href="/articles/desmoplasia-1">desmoplastic reaction</a> in which there is focal disruption of the normal breast tissue pattern. There are several features that can be considered as part of architectural distortion <sup>3</sup>:</p><ul>
  • +<li>contour abnormality</li>
  • +<li>trabecular thickening</li>
  • +<li>trabecular disorganisation</li>
  • +</ul><h5>Aetiology</h5><p>Many entities can cause architectural distortion <sup>1,4</sup>.<sup> </sup>In practice, the most common are surgery and malignancy. It is considered the third most common appearance of <a href="/articles/breast-neoplasms">breast cancer</a> <sup>1,6</sup>.</p><ul>
  • +<li>primary causes<ul>
  • +<li>invasive <a href="/articles/breast-neoplasms">breast cancer</a>, including both <a href="/articles/invasive-lobular-carcinoma-of-the-breast">invasive lobular carcinoma</a> and <a href="/articles/invasive-breast-carcinoma-of-no-special-type-1">invasive ductal carcinoma</a>
  • +</li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/ductal-carcinoma-in-situ">ductal carcinoma in situ</a></li>
  • +<li>
  • +<a href="/articles/radial-scar">radial scar</a>/<a href="/articles/radial-scar">complex sclerosing lesion</a>
  • +</li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/fat-necrosis-breast-2">fat necrosis</a></li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/sclerosing-adenosis-1">sclerosing adenosis</a></li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/fibromatosis-of-the-breast">fibromatosis</a></li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>secondary causes <ul>
  • +<li>
  • +<a href="/articles/post-surgical-breast-scar-1">postsurgical scars</a> (most common)</li>
  • +<li>trauma</li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/mastitis">infection</a></li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +</ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><p>Architectural distortion can be visually subtle. Compared to 2D mammography, <a href="/articles/digital-breast-tomosynthesis">digital breast tomosynthesis</a> increases the sensitivity, confidence, and interobserver agreement in detection of architectural distortion <sup>7-10</sup>. Tomosynthesis also helps localise the abnormality. Targeted ultrasound should then be performed to confirm the finding, but MRI is an alternative if no ultrasound correlate is found <sup>9</sup>.</p><h5>Mammography/US/MRI</h5><p>Architectural distortion is characterised by a number of possible appearances <sup>5</sup>:</p><ul>
  • +<li>radiating thin straight lines or spiculations</li>
  • +<li>focal retraction, distortion, or straightening at the edge of the parenchyma</li>
  • +<li>blurring of normal tissue planes such as the fat-fibroglandular junction</li>
  • +<li>straightening or thickening of <a href="/articles/cooper-ligament">Cooper ligaments</a>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>compression of tissue around a mass</li>
  • +</ul><h4>Radiology report</h4><p>Architectural distortion can be reported as a standalone finding or be associated with (adjacent to) another finding, such as <a href="/articles/asymmetry-mammography">asymmetry</a>, <a href="/articles/breast-calcifications">calcifications</a>, or <a href="/articles/breast-mass">mass</a>. In most cases, architectural distortion is a suspicious finding (<a href="/articles/breast-imaging-reporting-and-data-system-bi-rads-assessment-category-4">BI-RADS 4</a>) <sup>8,</sup><sup>9</sup>. The BI-RADS Atlas suggests that an ultrasound finding of architectural distortion thought to be due to postsurgical scar may be categorised as probably benign (<a href="/articles/breast-imaging-reporting-and-data-system-bi-rads-assessment-category-3">BI-RADS 3</a>), but there is sparse data supporting this approach <sup>5</sup>.</p><h4>See also</h4><ul><li>other imaging features of breast malignancy<ul>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/breast-mass">masses</a></li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/asymmetry-mammography">asymmetries</a></li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/breast-calcifications">calcifications</a></li>
  • +</ul>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.