MR liver iron quantification

Changed by Jan Frank Gerstenmaier, 2 Oct 2014

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

MR liver iron quantification is a non-invasive means of measuring liver iron concentration, a key indicator in the management of patients with haemochromatosis (primary or secondary).

Advantages

Apart from being non-invasive, sampling occurs in a large cross section of the liver, as opposed to biopsy which typically represents 1/50,000 of the whole liver. 

The acquisition for both methods described below is typically short and usually takes up 10 minutes of magnet time only.

Physics

There are two principle methods of liver iron quantification by MRI

T2 relaxometry

Iron within liver has paramagnetic properties and results in a decrease in T2 relaxation times. The accelerated relaxation is proportional to iron content. Decay models are attributed to the average signal intensity at  different echo times. These values may also be expressed as relaxation rates R2 (1/T2) or R2* (1/T2*). To To obtain reliable measurements of T2 times at different levels of iron overload, acquisition sequences with several different echo times are needed. The signal Signal intensity is then plotted as a function of echo time andcan be used to obtain a T2 parametric map.1

Signal intensity Ratio (SIR)

The ratio between the signal intensity of the liver and the signal intensity of paraspinal muscle that does not accumulate iron can be used to determine liver iron concentration Using the same slice, signal intensity measurements are performed using ROIs, avoiding large vessels in the liver. The sequences used are gradient recalled echoes as these are more sensitive to the paramagnetic effect of iron. One of the most recognised SIR method was developed at the University of Rennes, France.2 This method of quantification is automatically obtainedpresented here, including an online calculator.

T2 relaxometry vs SIR methods

Estimating liver iron content is easier to perform with SIR compared with T2 relaxometry. SIR methods are less accurate at iron concentration of >350 micromol Fe/g. However SIR are highly specific at all levels of iron concentration, and are reproducible. Overall, T2 relaxation methods are more accurate, but not yet standardised, and normally require off-site processing which attracts additional cost. An advantage of T2 relaxation methods is the utility of myocardial iron concentration measurement.3

  • -<p><strong>MR liver iron quantification</strong> is a non-invasive means of measuring liver iron concentration, a key indicator in the management of patients with haemochromatosis (primary or secondary).</p><p>Physics</p><p>There are two principle methods of liver iron quantification by MRI</p><p>T2 relaxometry</p><p>Iron within liver has paramagnetic properties and results in a decrease in T2 relaxation times. The accelerated relaxation is proportional to iron content. Decay models are attributed to the average signal intensity at  different echo times. These values may also be expressed as relaxation rates R2 (1/T2) or R2* (1/T2*). To obtain reliable measurements of T2 at different levels of iron overload, acquisition sequences with several different echo times are needed. The signal intensity is then plotted as a function of echo time and a T2 parametric map is automatically obtained.</p>
  • +<p><strong>MR liver iron quantification</strong> is a non-invasive means of measuring liver iron concentration, a key indicator in the management of patients with <a href="/articles/haemochromatosis">haemochromatosis</a> (primary or secondary).</p><h4>Advantages</h4><p>Apart from being non-invasive, sampling occurs in a large cross section of the liver, as opposed to biopsy which typically represents 1/50,000 of the whole liver. </p><p>The acquisition for both methods described below is typically short and usually takes up 10 minutes of magnet time only.</p><h4>Physics</h4><p>There are two principle methods of liver iron quantification by MRI</p><h5>T2 relaxometry</h5><p>Iron within liver has paramagnetic properties and results in a decrease in T2 relaxation times. The accelerated relaxation is proportional to iron content. Decay models are attributed to the average signal intensity at  different echo times. To obtain reliable measurements of T2 times at different levels of iron overload, acquisition sequences with several different echo times are needed. Signal intensity as a function of echo time can be used to obtain a T2 parametric map.<sup>1</sup></p><h5><strong>Signal intensity Ratio (SIR)</strong></h5><p>The ratio between the signal intensity of the liver and the signal intensity of paraspinal muscle that does not accumulate iron can be used to determine liver iron concentration Using the same slice, signal intensity measurements are performed using ROIs, avoiding large vessels in the liver. The sequences used are gradient recalled echoes as these are more sensitive to the paramagnetic effect of iron. One of the most recognised SIR method was developed at the University of Rennes, France.<sup>2</sup> This method of quantification is presented <a href="http://www.radio.univ-rennes1.fr/Sources/EN/Hemo.html">here</a>, including an online calculator.</p><h5>T2 relaxometry vs SIR methods</h5><p>Estimating liver iron content is easier to perform with SIR compared with T2 relaxometry. SIR methods are less accurate at iron concentration of &gt;350 micromol Fe/g. However SIR are highly specific at all levels of iron concentration, and are reproducible. Overall, T2 relaxation methods are more accurate, but not yet standardised, and normally require off-site processing which attracts additional cost. An advantage of T2 relaxation methods is the utility of myocardial iron concentration measurement.<sup>3</sup></p><p> </p>

References changed:

  • 1. St Pierre TG, Clark PR, Chua-anusorn W et-al. Noninvasive measurement and imaging of liver iron concentrations using proton magnetic resonance. Blood. 2005;105 (2): 855-61. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-01-0177">doi:10.1182/blood-2004-01-0177</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15256427">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
  • 2. Gandon Y, Olivié D, Guyader D et-al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI. Lancet. 2004;363 (9406): 357-62. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15436-6">doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15436-6</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15070565">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>
  • 3. Alústiza Echeverría JM, Castiella A, Emparanza JI. Quantification of iron concentration in the liver by MRI. Insights Imaging. 2012;3 (2): 173-80. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0132-1">doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0132-1</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3314738">Free text at pubmed</a> - <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22696043">Pubmed citation</a><span class="auto"></span>

Sections changed:

  • Imaging Technology

Systems changed:

  • Haematology
  • Hepatobiliary
Images Changes:

Image 1 Diagram ( create )

Caption was changed:
T2 relaxometry methidmethod

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.