Progressive non-fluent aphasia

Changed by Frank Gaillard, 10 Feb 2017

Updates to Article Attributes

Title was changed:
Agrammatic variant primary progressiveProgressive non-fluent aphasia
Body was changed:

AgrammaticProgressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), also known as agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia, also known as progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA) is generally considered to be one of three subtypes of primary progressive aphasia, along with semantic dementia and logopaenic dementia.

Terminology

It is important to note that the clinical literature surrounding primary progressive aphasias, and neurodegenerative diseases associated with fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and generally, is a subtypelarge, rapidly evolving and heterogeneous, more so than many other fields 2,3. The result is that there is great variation in terminology and classification of language variant front-temporal lobar degeneration (lvFTLD)various conditions making it perilous for student and clinicians alike.

Clinical presentation

PNFA is typically characterised by "effortful, dysfluent and agrammatical speech". Atrophy is most marked in a perisylvian distribution on the left involving the inferior frontal gyrus (including Broca's area) and superior temporal gyrus [needs reference]. There is often unilateral widening of the Sylvian fissure [needs reference].

Diagnostic Criteria

Diagnostic criteria have been proposed as follows 1:

    Clinical
  • clinical diagnosis of nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA:

    At

    PNFA
    • at least one of:
      1. agrammatism in language production
      2. effortful, halting speech with inconsistent speech sound error (apraxia of speech)

      And

    • and at least 2 of:
      1. impaired comprehension of syntactically complex sentences
      2. spared single word comprehension
      3. spared object knowledge
  • Imaging-supported nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA diagnosis:

    Both

    diagnosis of PNFA
    • both of the following:
      1. clinical diagnosis of nonfluentnon-fluent/agrammatic variant PPA
      2. imaging showing predominant left posterior front-insular atrophy on MRI and/or predominant left posterior front-insular hypoperfusion on SPECT or PET
      Nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA
  • PNFA with definite pathology:

    Both

    • both of the following:
      1. clinical diagnosis of nonfluentnon-fluent/agrammatic variant PPA
      2. histopathologic evidence of a specific neurodegenerative pathology (eg. FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP, AD, other) or presence of a known pathogenic mutation

Radiographic features

CT and MRI

Atrophy is variable, but generally most marked in the posterior frontal, insular cortex and temporal lobe, including the hippocampus 1,2. Generally, the left hemisphere is thought as being most involved, although this is neither universally the case 1,2.

Nuclear medicine

SPECT or FDG-PET demonstrate hypoperfusion in a similar distribution to morphological changes (see above). 

  • -<p><strong>Agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia</strong>, also known as<strong> progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA) </strong>is one of the clinical <a href="/articles/neurodegenerative-disease">neurodegenerative diseases</a> associated with <a href="/articles/fronto-temporal-lobar-degeneration">fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)</a> and is a subtype of <a href="/articles/lvftdl">language variant front-temporal lobar degeneration (lvFTLD)</a>. </p><p>PNFA is typically characterised by "effortful, dysfluent and agrammatical speech". Atrophy is most marked in a perisylvian distribution on the left involving the inferior frontal gyrus (including Broca's area) and superior temporal gyrus [needs reference]. There is often unilateral widening of the <a href="/articles/sylvian-fissure">Sylvian fissure</a> [needs reference].</p><h4>Diagnostic Criteria <sup>1</sup>
  • -</h4><h5>Clinical diagnosis of nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA:</h5><p>At least one of:</p><ol>
  • +<p><strong>Progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA)</strong>, also known as <strong>agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia, </strong>is generally considered to be one of three subtypes of <a href="/articles/primary-progressive-aphasia-3">primary progressive aphasia</a>, along with <a href="/articles/semantic-variant-primary-progressive-aphasia">semantic dementia</a> and <a href="/articles/logopaenic-dementia">logopaenic dementia</a>.</p><h4>Terminology</h4><p>It is important to note that the literature surrounding primary progressive aphasias, and neurodegenerative diseases generally, is large, rapidly evolving and heterogeneous, more so than many other fields <sup>2,3</sup>. The result is that there is great variation in terminology and classification of various conditions making it perilous for student and clinicians alike.</p><h4>Clinical presentation</h4><p>PNFA is typically characterised by "effortful, dysfluent and agrammatical speech".</p><h5>Diagnostic Criteria</h5><p>Diagnostic criteria have been proposed as follows <sup>1:</sup></p><ul>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>clinical diagnosis of PNFA</strong><ul>
  • +<li>at least one of:<ol>
  • -</ol><p>And at least 2 of:</p><ol>
  • +</ol>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>and at least 2 of:<ol>
  • -</ol><h5>Imaging-supported nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA diagnosis:</h5><p>Both of the following:</p><ol>
  • -<li>clinical diagnosis of nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA</li>
  • +</ol>
  • +</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>Imaging-supported diagnosis of PNFA</strong><ul><li>both of the following:<ol>
  • +<li>clinical diagnosis of non-fluent/agrammatic variant PPA</li>
  • -</ol><h5>Nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA with definite pathology:</h5><p>Both of the following:</p><ol>
  • -<li>clinical diagnosis of nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA</li>
  • +</ol>
  • +</li></ul>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>PNFA with definite pathology</strong><ul><li>both of the following:<ol>
  • +<li>clinical diagnosis of non-fluent/agrammatic variant PPA</li>
  • -</ol>
  • +</ol>
  • +</li></ul>
  • +</li>
  • +</ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>CT and MRI</h5><p>Atrophy is variable, but generally most marked in the posterior frontal, insular cortex and temporal lobe, including the hippocampus <sup>1,2</sup>. Generally, the left hemisphere is thought as being most involved, although this is neither universally the case <sup>1,2</sup>.</p><h5>Nuclear medicine</h5><p>SPECT or FDG-PET demonstrate hypoperfusion in a similar distribution to morphological changes (see above). </p>

References changed:

  • 3. Haller S, Garibotto V, Kövari E, Bouras C, Xekardaki A, Rodriguez C, Lazarczyk MJ, Giannakopoulos P, Lovblad KO. Neuroimaging of dementia in 2013: what radiologists need to know. European radiology. 23 (12): 3393-404. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2957-0">doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2957-0</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23839168">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>
  • 2. Knibb, Jonathan A., Woollams, Anna M., Hodges, John R., Patterson, Karalyn. Making sense of progressive non-fluent aphasia: an analysis of conversational speech. Brain. 132 (10): 2734. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp207">doi:10.1093/brain/awp207</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.