Transient ischemic attack

Changed by Rohit Sharma, 4 Apr 2024
Disclosures - updated 18 Aug 2023: Nothing to disclose

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs), in the most recent definition, correspond to describe a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord, or retinal ischaemia, without acute infarction.

Terminology

In the past, TIAtransient ischaemic attack was arbitrarily distinguished from stroke by the duration of neurological symptoms of less than 24 hours 1. However, this definition allowed for risk of permanent infarction to be classified as a TIAtransient ischaemic attack, and thus the aforementioned tissue-based definition was favoured 1. It is well established nowadays that in most TIAstransient ischaemic attacks, symptoms resolve in less than one hour but occasionally prolonged episodes may occur 1,2.

Epidemiology

The incidence increases with age, with approximately 0.1 million new cases per year reported world wide. A male gender predominance noted in an American population 10.

Risk factors

Risk factors are essentially typical vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus 10 10.

Clinical presentation

The clinical features are variable and dependent on the mechanism (see below):

  • low-flow TIAtransient ischaemic attack: classic transient focal neurological symptoms, either anterior or posterior circulation symptoms, last last only minutes, and are often recurrent 3

  • embolic TIAtransient ischaemic attack: similar presentation to a thromboembolic ischaemic stroke, localised to a specific arterial territory rather than a general circulation, tend to last hours, and do not tend to be recurrent 3

  • lacunar or small penetrating vessel TIAtransient ischaemic attack: also known as the capsular warning syndrome, these are similar to low-flow TIAstransient ischaemic attacks but the transient and recurrent neurological symptoms are those of lacunar stroke syndromes4

Pathology

There are three pathophysiological mechanisms:

  • low-flow TIAtransient ischaemic attack: caused by large artery stenosis (e.g. internal carotid artery stenosis)1,3

  • embolic TIAtransient ischaemic attack: caused by the same aetiologies of thromboembolic ischaemic stroke1,3

    • there is controversy as to whether these should actually be classified as strokes as per the tissue-based definition

  • lacunar or small penetrating vessel TIAtransient ischaemic attack: caused by either stenosis of intracranial arteries (e.g. middle cerebral artery stenosis) or lipohyalinosis of penetrating arteries 1,4

Radiographic features

There is uncertainty regarding the radiographic features of TIAstransient ischaemic attacks given that there is currently no perfect radiographic corollary to the pathology, especially when even minute regions of infarction could differentiate a stroke from a TIAtransient ischaemic attack 1. While CT brain is often unremarkable, there is controversy regarding the significance of regions demonstrating high signal on DWI, a finding present in approximately half of all TIAstransient ischaemic attacks 5.

It has been proposed that if a region demonstrates high signal on DWI, and and especially if there is no early DWI reversal, then that is a region of infarction and hence should be a stroke and not a TIAtransient ischaemic attack 5. However, the confusion lies if a lesion demonstrates early DWI reversal, because it has been found that these such lesions may still have some degree of infarction, and thus the patient may, in fact, have had a stroke instead of a TIAtransient ischaemic attack 6,7. Thus, determining which, or determining if all, "DWI-positive" TIAstransient ischaemic attacks should, in fact, be classified as strokes remains unclear and a subject of ongoing research 5.

Treatment and prognosis

Management is complex, but in short, revolves around determining the aetiology of the TIAtransient ischaemic attack, risk stratification, and then medical (e.g. aspirin, statin) and/or surgical therapy (e.g. carotid endarterectomy) where appropriate 8.

History and etymology

The term transient ischaemic attack was coined by Charles Miller Fisher (1913-2012), a renowned Canadian neurologist, in 1951 9. The term capsular warning syndrome was coined by Geoffrey Donnan, Australian neurologist, and colleagues in 1993 4.

  • -<p><strong>Transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs)</strong>, in the most recent definition, correspond to a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord, or retinal ischaemia, without acute infarction.</p><h4>Terminology </h4><p>In the past, TIA was arbitrarily distinguished from <a href="/articles/stroke">stroke</a> by the duration of neurological symptoms of less than 24 hours <sup>1</sup>. However, this definition allowed for risk of permanent infarction to be classified as a TIA, and thus the aforementioned tissue-based definition was favoured <sup>1</sup>. It is well established nowadays that in most TIAs, symptoms resolve in less than one hour but occasionally prolonged episodes may occur <sup>1,2</sup>. </p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>The incidence increases with age, with approximately 0.1 million new cases per year reported world wide. A male gender predominance noted in an American population <sup>10</sup>.</p><h5>Risk factors</h5><p>Risk factors are essentially typical vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus<sup> 10</sup>.</p><h4>Clinical presentation</h4><p>The clinical features are variable and dependent on the mechanism (see below):</p><ul>
  • -<li><p>low-flow TIA: classic transient focal neurological symptoms, either anterior or posterior circulation symptoms, last only minutes, and are often recurrent <sup>3</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p>embolic TIA: similar presentation to a thromboembolic <a href="/articles/ischaemic-stroke">ischaemic stroke</a>, localised to a specific <a href="/articles/brain-arterial-vascular-territories">arterial territory</a> rather than a general circulation, tend to last hours, and do not tend to be recurrent <sup>3</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p>lacunar or small penetrating vessel TIA: also known as the <strong>capsular warning syndrome</strong>, these are similar to low-flow TIAs but the transient and recurrent neurological symptoms are those of <a href="/articles/lacunar-stroke-syndrome">lacunar stroke syndromes</a><strong> </strong><sup>4</sup></p></li>
  • +<p><strong>Transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs)</strong> describe a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord, or retinal ischaemia, without acute infarction.</p><h4>Terminology&nbsp;</h4><p>In the past, transient ischaemic attack was arbitrarily distinguished from <a href="/articles/stroke">stroke</a> by the duration of neurological symptoms of less than 24 hours <sup>1</sup>. However, this definition allowed for risk of permanent infarction to be classified as a transient ischaemic attack, and thus the aforementioned tissue-based definition was favoured <sup>1</sup>. It is well established nowadays that in most transient ischaemic attacks, symptoms resolve in less than one hour but occasionally prolonged episodes may occur <sup>1,2</sup>.&nbsp;</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>The incidence increases with age, with approximately 0.1 million new cases per year reported world wide. A male gender predominance noted in an American population <sup>10</sup>.</p><h5>Risk factors</h5><p>Risk factors are essentially typical vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus<sup>&nbsp;10</sup>.</p><h4>Clinical presentation</h4><p>The clinical features are variable and dependent on the mechanism (see below):</p><ul>
  • +<li><p>low-flow transient ischaemic attack: classic transient focal neurological symptoms, either anterior or posterior circulation symptoms,&nbsp;last only minutes, and are often recurrent <sup>3</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p>embolic transient ischaemic attack: similar presentation to a thromboembolic <a href="/articles/ischaemic-stroke">ischaemic stroke</a>, localised to a specific <a href="/articles/brain-arterial-vascular-territories">arterial territory</a> rather than a general circulation, tend to last hours, and do not tend to be recurrent <sup>3</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p>lacunar or small penetrating vessel transient ischaemic attack: also known as the <strong>capsular warning syndrome</strong>, these are similar to low-flow transient ischaemic attacks but the transient and recurrent neurological symptoms are those of <a href="/articles/lacunar-stroke-syndrome">lacunar stroke syndromes</a><strong>&nbsp;</strong><sup>4</sup></p></li>
  • -<li><p>low-flow TIA: caused by large artery stenosis (e.g. <a href="/articles/carotid-artery-stenosis">internal carotid artery stenosis</a>) <sup>1,3</sup></p></li>
  • +<li><p>low-flow transient ischaemic attack: caused by large artery stenosis (e.g. <a href="/articles/carotid-artery-stenosis">internal carotid artery stenosis</a>)&nbsp;<sup>1,3</sup></p></li>
  • -<p>embolic TIA: caused by the same aetiologies of thromboembolic <a href="/articles/ischaemic-stroke">ischaemic stroke</a> <sup>1,3</sup></p>
  • +<p>embolic transient ischaemic attack: caused by the same aetiologies of thromboembolic <a href="/articles/ischaemic-stroke">ischaemic stroke</a>&nbsp;<sup>1,3</sup></p>
  • -<li><p>lacunar or small penetrating vessel TIA: caused by either stenosis of intracranial arteries (e.g. middle cerebral artery stenosis) or lipohyalinosis of penetrating arteries <sup>1,4</sup></p></li>
  • -</ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><p>There is uncertainty regarding the radiographic features of TIAs given that there is currently no perfect radiographic corollary to the pathology, especially when even minute regions of infarction could differentiate a stroke from a TIA <sup>1</sup>. While CT brain is often unremarkable, there is controversy regarding the significance of regions demonstrating high signal on <a href="/articles/diffusion-weighted-imaging-2">DWI</a>, a finding present in approximately half of all TIAs <sup>5</sup>.</p><p>It has been proposed that if a region demonstrates high signal on DWI, and especially if there is no <a href="/articles/early-dwi-reversal-in-ischaemic-stroke">early DWI reversal</a>, then that is a region of infarction and hence should be a stroke and not a TIA <sup>5</sup>. However, the confusion lies if a lesion demonstrates <a href="/articles/early-dwi-reversal-in-ischaemic-stroke">early DWI reversal</a>, because it has been found that these such lesions may still have some degree of infarction, and thus the patient may, in fact, have had a stroke instead of a TIA <sup>6,7</sup>. Thus, determining which, or determining if all, "DWI-positive" TIAs should, in fact, be classified as strokes remains unclear and a subject of ongoing research <sup>5</sup>. </p><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>Management is complex, but in short, revolves around determining the aetiology of the TIA, risk stratification, and then medical (e.g. aspirin) and/or surgical therapy (e.g. <a href="/articles/carotid-endarterectomy">carotid endarterectomy</a>) where appropriate <sup>8</sup>.</p><h4>History and etymology</h4><p>The term transient ischaemic attack was coined by <strong>Charles Miller Fisher</strong> (1913-2012), a renowned Canadian neurologist, in 1951 <sup>9</sup>. The term capsular warning syndrome was coined by <strong>Geoffrey Donnan</strong>, Australian neurologist, and colleagues in 1993 <sup>4</sup>.</p>
  • +<li><p>lacunar or small penetrating vessel transient ischaemic attack: caused by either stenosis of intracranial arteries (e.g. middle cerebral artery stenosis) or lipohyalinosis of penetrating arteries <sup>1,4</sup></p></li>
  • +</ul><h4>Radiographic features</h4><p>There is uncertainty regarding the radiographic features of transient ischaemic attacks given that there is currently no perfect radiographic corollary to the pathology, especially when even minute regions of infarction could differentiate a stroke from a transient ischaemic attack <sup>1</sup>. While CT brain is often unremarkable, there is controversy regarding the significance of regions demonstrating high signal on <a href="/articles/diffusion-weighted-imaging-2">DWI</a>, a finding present in approximately half of all transient ischaemic attacks <sup>5</sup>.</p><p>It has been proposed that if a region demonstrates high signal on DWI,&nbsp;and especially if there is no <a href="/articles/early-dwi-reversal-in-ischaemic-stroke">early DWI reversal</a>, then that is a region of infarction and hence should be a stroke and not a transient ischaemic attack <sup>5</sup>. However, the confusion lies if a lesion demonstrates <a href="/articles/early-dwi-reversal-in-ischaemic-stroke">early DWI reversal</a>, because it has been found that these such lesions may still have some degree of infarction, and thus the patient may, in fact, have had a stroke instead of a transient ischaemic attack <sup>6,7</sup>. Thus, determining which, or determining if all, "DWI-positive" transient ischaemic attacks should, in fact, be classified as strokes remains unclear and a subject of ongoing research <sup>5</sup>.&nbsp;</p><h4>Treatment and prognosis</h4><p>Management is complex, but in short, revolves around determining the aetiology of the transient ischaemic attack, risk stratification, and then medical (e.g. aspirin, statin) and/or surgical therapy (e.g. <a href="/articles/carotid-endarterectomy">carotid endarterectomy</a>) where appropriate <sup>8</sup>.</p><h4>History and etymology</h4><p>The term transient ischaemic attack was coined by <strong>Charles Miller Fisher</strong> (1913-2012), a renowned Canadian neurologist, in 1951 <sup>9</sup>. The term capsular warning syndrome was coined by <strong>Geoffrey Donnan</strong>, Australian neurologist, and colleagues in 1993 <sup>4</sup>.</p>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.