Usual interstitial pneumonia

Changed by Amir Rezaee, 26 Mar 2016

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is one of the morphological and pathological patterns of interstitial lung disease. In the past the term UIP was used synonymously with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) while more lately the term idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is applied solely to the clinical syndrome associated with the morphologic pattern of UIP and specifically excludes entities such as non specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) 1. Differentiation of UIP is important as it carries the worst prognosis and treatment varies widely from the other types of ILDs.

Clinical presentation

The clinical presentation can be variable and can overlap with other entities such as NSIP which can make the diagnosis challenging 11. Most patients present with progressive exertional shortness of breath and chronic dry cough usually over a period of 24 months before diagnosis 12. Physical examination usually reveals fine end expiratory crackles and in severe cases finger clubbing. Lung function test shows restrictive pattern with decreased DLCO.

Pathology

The histological diagnosis of UIP is based on temporal and spatial heterogeneity, which is the identification of fibrotic lesions at different stages (fibroblastic infiltrates, mature fibrosis, and honeycombing) within the same biopsy specimen and architectural distortion. Honeycombing particularly if it is more than 5% of the lung volume is an almost 100% specific finding. On a typical biopsy, there are areas of normal lung alternating with interstitial fibrosis and honeycombing. The distribution of UIP characteristically is with an apicobasal gradient with basal and peripheral (subpleural) predominance, although it is often patchy.

Inflammation is absent or mild and mostly limited to the areas of honeycombing 1-12.

Aetiologies

UIP pattern of ILD can be seen in idiopathic lungpulmonary fibrosis or secondary to underlying systemic diseases. These would include:

In practice, the diagnosis is usually made in a multidisciplinary approach involving chest physicians, radiologists and pathologists with expertise in interstitial lung disease (ILD) 12.

Radiographic features

Plain radiograph

Plain film features are nonspecific. While chest radiographs can be even normal in patients with very early disease, in advanced disease, it may show decreased lung volumes and basal fine to coarse reticulation. Usually due to more extensive involvement of the lower lobes, the major fissure is shifted inferiorly which is best seen on the lateral chest radiograph.

HRCT

When describing imaging features, the term UIP pattern is often used, which has specific diagnostic criteria on HRCT 16. The positive predictive value of CT in the diagnosis of UIP is high and ranges from 70-100% 1. Similar to the pathology specimen, cross-sectional imaging also reveals heterogeneity, with patchy areas of fibrosis alternating with areas of normal lung 5.

Typical features include 1,5:

  • honeycombing: particularly if it is more than 8 % of lung parenchyma is highly specific for UIP. In general UIP can be divided to two groups, those with less than 5% honeycombing and those with more than 5% honeycombing. It mainly reflects the stage and severity of the disease. Those with less than 5% h/c may pose diagnostic difficulty as differentiation with NSIP on imaging can be impossible; however these still follow similar prognosis as other UIP patients 2
  • reticular opacities: in the immediate subpleural lung, often associated with honeycombing and/or traction bronchiectasis,  with peripheral and lower lobe predominance is considered a very good differentiating feature from patients with NSIP and concurrent emphysema 6
  • reticular opacity to groundgland glass opacity ratio: one or greater
    •  ground-glass opacities: usually less extensive than the reticular pattern and almost never seen in isolation - usually happens in areas of reticulation or honeycombing
  • lung architectural distortion: which reflects lung fibrosis and is often prominent
  • lobar volume loss (predominantly lower lobes) is seen in cases of more advanced fibrosis

See article: UIP pattern: diagnostic HRCT criteria

Treatment and prognosis

In patients with UIP, areas of ground-glass attenuation tend to increase in extent or progress to fibrosis despite treatment 8,13.  In those with more active inflammation involving the pulmonary interstitium there is faster progression of honeycombing in long-term follow-up 10. The average rate of progression of honeycombing in patients with idiopathic usual interstitial pneumonia according to one study was 0.4% of lung volume per month 7.

Differential diagnosis

A key imaging differential on cross-sectional imaging would be

Others include

  • -<p><strong>Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) </strong>is one of the morphological and pathological patterns of <a href="/articles/interstitial-lung-disease">interstitial lung disease</a>. In the past the term UIP was used synonymously with <a href="/articles/idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis">idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis</a> (IPF) while more lately the term idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is applied solely to the clinical syndrome associated with the morphologic pattern of UIP and specifically excludes entities such as <a href="/articles/non-specific-interstitial-pneumonia-1">non specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP</a>) and <a href="/articles/desquamative-interstitial-pneumonia">desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP</a>) <sup>1</sup>. Differentiation of UIP is important as it carries the worst prognosis and treatment varies widely from the other types of ILDs.</p><h4>Clinical presentation</h4><p>The clinical presentation can be variable and can overlap with other entities such as NSIP which can make the diagnosis challenging <sup>11</sup>. Most patients present with progressive exertional shortness of breath and chronic dry cough usually over a period of 24 months before diagnosis <sup>12</sup>. Physical examination usually reveals fine end expiratory crackles and in severe cases finger clubbing. Lung function test shows restrictive pattern with decreased DLCO.</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The histological diagnosis of UIP is based on temporal and spatial heterogeneity, which is the identification of fibrotic lesions at different stages (fibroblastic infiltrates, mature fibrosis, and honeycombing) within the same biopsy specimen and architectural distortion. <a href="/articles/honeycombing">Honeycombing</a> particularly if it is more than 5% of the lung volume is an almost 100% specific finding. On a typical biopsy, there are areas of normal lung alternating with interstitial fibrosis and honeycombing. The distribution of UIP characteristically is with an apicobasal gradient with basal and peripheral (subpleural) predominance, although it is often patchy.</p><p>Inflammation is absent or mild and mostly limited to the areas of honeycombing <sup>1-12</sup>.</p><h5>Aetiologies</h5><p>UIP pattern of ILD can be seen in <a href="/articles/idiopathic-lung-fibrosis">idiopathic lung fibrosis</a> or secondary to underlying systemic diseases. These would include:</p><ul>
  • +<p><strong>Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) </strong>is one of the morphological and pathological patterns of <a href="/articles/interstitial-lung-disease">interstitial lung disease</a>. In the past the term UIP was used synonymously with <a href="/articles/idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis">idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis</a> (IPF) while more lately the term idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is applied solely to the clinical syndrome associated with the morphologic pattern of UIP and specifically excludes entities such as <a href="/articles/non-specific-interstitial-pneumonia-1">non specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP</a>) and <a href="/articles/desquamative-interstitial-pneumonia">desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP</a>) <sup>1</sup>. Differentiation of UIP is important as it carries the worst prognosis and treatment varies widely from the other types of ILDs.</p><h4>Clinical presentation</h4><p>The clinical presentation can be variable and can overlap with other entities such as NSIP which can make the diagnosis challenging <sup>11</sup>. Most patients present with progressive exertional shortness of breath and chronic dry cough usually over a period of 24 months before diagnosis <sup>12</sup>. Physical examination usually reveals fine end expiratory crackles and in severe cases finger clubbing. Lung function test shows restrictive pattern with decreased DLCO.</p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The histological diagnosis of UIP is based on temporal and spatial heterogeneity, which is the identification of fibrotic lesions at different stages (fibroblastic infiltrates, mature fibrosis, and honeycombing) within the same biopsy specimen and architectural distortion. <a href="/articles/honeycombing">Honeycombing</a> particularly if it is more than 5% of the lung volume is an almost 100% specific finding. On a typical biopsy, there are areas of normal lung alternating with interstitial fibrosis and honeycombing. The distribution of UIP characteristically is with an apicobasal gradient with basal and peripheral (subpleural) predominance, although it is often patchy.</p><p>Inflammation is absent or mild and mostly limited to the areas of honeycombing <sup>1-12</sup>.</p><h5>Aetiologies</h5><p>UIP pattern of ILD can be seen in <a title="Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis" href="/articles/idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis">idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis</a> or secondary to underlying systemic diseases. These would include:</p><ul>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.