Winquist and Hansen classification of femoral shaft fractures

Changed by Yuranga Weerakkody, 9 Aug 2022
Disclosures - updated 10 May 2022: Nothing to disclose

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

The Winquist classification of femoral shaft fractures is based on fracture comminution and was proposed by Winquist in 1980. This classification is used with regards to management decision making, in determining whether a fracture requires an intramedullary nail or open reduction. 

  • Typetype 0: no comminution or a small butterfly fragment less than 25 % of the width of the bone
  • Typetype I: small butterfly fragment less than 25 % of the width of the bone
  • Typetype II: butterfly fragment 50 % or less of the width of the bone
  • Typetype III: comminuted with a large butterfly fragment, greater than 50 % of the width of the bone
  • Typetype IV: severe comminution of an entire segment of bone (segmental comminution)

See also

  • -<p>The <strong>Winquist classification of femoral shaft fractures </strong>is based on fracture comminution and was proposed by Winquist in 1980. This classification is used with regards to management decision making, in determining whether a fracture requires an intramedullary nail or open reduction. </p><p><strong>Type 0:</strong> no comminution or a small butterfly fragment less than 25 % of the width of the bone</p><p><strong>Type I:</strong> small butterfly fragment less than 25 % of the width of the bone</p><p><strong>Type II:</strong> butterfly fragment 50 % or less of the width of the bone</p><p><strong>Type III:</strong> comminuted with a large butterfly fragment, greater than 50 % of the width of the bone</p><p><strong>Type IV:</strong> severe comminution of an entire segment of bone (segmental comminution)</p><p> </p>
  • +<p>The <strong>Winquist classification of femoral shaft fractures </strong>is based on fracture comminution and was proposed by Winquist in 1980. This classification is used with regards to management decision making, in determining whether a fracture requires an intramedullary nail or open reduction. </p><ul>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>type 0:</strong> no comminution or a small butterfly fragment less than 25 % of the width of the bone</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>type I:</strong> small butterfly fragment less than 25 % of the width of the bone</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>type II:</strong> butterfly fragment 50 % or less of the width of the bone</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>type III:</strong> comminuted with a large butterfly fragment, greater than 50 % of the width of the bone</li>
  • +<li>
  • +<strong>type IV:</strong> severe comminution of an entire segment of bone (segmental comminution)</li>
  • +</ul><h4>See also</h4><ul><li><a title="femoral shaft fractures" href="/articles/femoral-shaft-fractures">femoral shaft fractures</a></li></ul>

References changed:

  • 2. Torres L, Lycans D, Goel A. Femoral Shaft Fractures. Orthopedic Surgery Clerkship. 2017;:291-7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52567-9_65">doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52567-9_65</a>
  • 3. Kanakaris N & Giannoudis P. Femoral Shaft Fractures. Trauma and Orthopaedic Classifications. 2014;:325-6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6572-9_73">doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6572-9_73</a>

Updates to Synonym Attributes

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.